Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Original Research
Pictorial Essay
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Original Research
Pictorial Essay
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Original Research
Pictorial Essay
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Guest Editorial
2 (
1
); 3-4
doi:
10.25259/IJBI_17_2023

Future of breast imaging

Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9 Canada.

*Corresponding author: Supriya Kulkarni, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9 Canada. supriya.kulkarni@uhn.ca

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Kulkarni S. Future of breast imaging. Indian J Breast Imaging. 2024;2:3-4. doi: 10.25259/IJBI_17_2023

Breast imaging is at a very exciting place from where the future looks very promising. Rapid integration of risk assessment tools, individual risk factors and medical history and addition of technologies such as Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Contrast Enhanced Mammography and Contrast Enhanced MRI are paving way to early detection of breast cancer.

The heterogeneity of breast cancer is well known, and the classification continues to evolve from the traditional histological variants to distinct subtypes based on immunohistochemical expression and further molecular classification. Heterogeneity in genetic expression is likely responsible for variable behaviors and prognosis.[1] The pioneering work by Perou et al. in the beginning of the century has led to the evolution of multiple gene panels (assays) such as 21-Gene recurrence score (Oncotype Dx), Prosigna gene signature, Mammaprint etc.[2] These technologies have allowed medical oncologists to move away from one hat fits all approach to a more personalized treatment plan with de-escalation of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments.

However, despite advanced imaging techniques such as MRI, PET CT, targeted treatments, and tailored chemotherapeutic regimes, we are still quite far away from having patient specific predictive information which would allow improved therapeutic interventions and retain quality of life for the patient.

MRI is established in the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer as the most accurate way of evaluating the response to treatment and estimating residual tumor tissue before patient goes for surgery, but it would be most ideal if there was a way to know how the specific tumor would respond before the administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

MRI images are enriched data, a goldmine for machine learning. Advancement in artificial intelligence (AI) will allow mining of these rich data sets and determine individual characteristics of the breast tissue (signature) which will provide prognostic and predictive information.[3] This will further direct treatment selection for the specific type of breast tissue, truly personalizing adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments.

Artificial intelligence and Machine learning will play a significant role in screening and diagnostic breast imaging. Kristina Lång’s recent publication in The Lancet demonstrated the safety of AI based mammography reporting showing comparable results with double reading while substantially lowering the screen-reading workload.[4]

While we are racing ahead with technology and AI, advocacy efforts also need to be enhanced so that we can offer the right breast cancer screening test to women based on individual risk factors and breast density.

Breast imaging radiologists are integral to breast cancer diagnosis and management. The future of breast imaging will involve ongoing research and strong multidisciplinary collaboration, which will deliver cutting edge care to our patients, allow transformative advocacy, and provide compassionate support.

References

  1. . Molecular classification of breast cancer: Relevance and challenges. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2023;147:46-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2022-0070-RA
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , et al. “Molecular portraits of human breast tumours”. Nature. 2000;406(6797):747-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. How radiomics can improve breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. J Clin Med.. 2023;12:1372. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041372
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): A clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study. Lancet Oncol.. 2023;24:936-44. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00298-X
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
14

PDF downloads
10
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections